We are justly very proud of our products and services and now we have even more reason to be. A totally Independent Punter's Protection Monitoring Service called 'Punters Choice' have been downloading our Saturday selections for over 4 years. In this way prospective members can be assured that figures we supply to them are not simply made up as is the case with many of this countries disreputible services.

In year one (1999) The Whipjumped straight to the front of all the other Rating Services for Sydney with an amazing profit result. Our standard Overlay Service recorded a fantastic 30% Profit on turnover in Sydney alone. Most Profitable Rating Service for1999.

In year two (2000) The Whip fought off all challenges and again led Sydney Rating Services with an Accumulated profit of 14% on Standard Overlay selections. Melbourne PC Top selections showed a remarkable 52% profit on turnover. Most Profitable Rating Service for 2000.

In year three (2001) The Whip returned an Accumulated profit of 12% in Sydney with Double Overlays recording a super impressive 20% for that year. Naturally, The Whip retained it's No.1 ranking for that year as well. Most Profitable Rating Service for 2001.

In year four (2002) The Whip remained on top of the profitability tables for Ratings Services with the main profit coming from Melbourne using the PC Top selection criteria. The accumulated profit of 45% for the 4 years of scrutiny in that sector should be enough to convince prospective member of our bonafides. Most Profitable Rating Service for 2002.

Further brilliant and more up-todate evidence is below:-

A longstanding member of The Whip (prefers we simply use his initials of D.R.A. of Hornsby NSW) has also been recording our performances on the individual Market priced races.

After doing the analysis, The Whip then goes back into the 8 years of its historic data and where they find an exceptionally high win ratio with their No.1 selections, they raise the framed Market Percentage to between 95-100%. Using their unique Stats Wizard tool, they use criteria like the racetrack, the distance, the class and sometimes the track condition as their guide.

Races where their record is well above average a rating of 90% and races on an average strike rate a market based on 85%.

Races below average or POOR strike rates historically get a 75 - 80% ranking. Here are his results for the six months ending Mar. 03

Profit /loss by race% from 14 Sept 2002

Win
Race%_ Stake_ Return __ P/L %
100% $300____- 0_-$300___- 100%

95%_ $2800_$3365+$565___+20%

90%_ $5200_$6537+$1337__+26%

85%_ $6400_$8711+$2311__+36%

80%_ $4400_$4275 -$125____ -3%

75%_ $3700_ $3364 -$336___ -9%

=========================

Total $22800 $26252 $3452__+15%

=========================

From this members advice we have increased our stake for races between 85% to 100% as this is clearly where our majority of profits lie. The lower graded races between 75% - 80% we advise members to Not Bet at all or to reduce their outlay by half.

DISCLAIMER

If we can satisfactorily maintain a 15-20% profit on turnover, we will be very happy with our advice. While we are more than pleased with our results so far this year, be warned that future profits cannot be guaranteed or realistically expect to maintain this level of profit. However, our aim back in 1999 was to be the leading and most profitable rating service in the country within 12 months. The fact that we have been on top for 4 consecutive years shows that we are simply the best and most profitable service in the country.